 |
|
|
Archaeology
Project
|
|
Part 3.
When Was the Compound Occupied?
Archaeologists
use several methods and types of evidence to determine when a site was
occupied, including stratigraphy, typology, and explicitly dated materials
(coins, texts). In addition, carbon-14 tests can be used on organic materials,
such as parchments (animal skins).
Stratigraphy
is the analysis of a sequence of layers, buildings and other features
of a site. Archaeologists dig trenches to expose the features of a site,
and then use that initial sounding to follow the walls and cavities
that they discover. The presumption is that higher layers represent
later occupations, although there can be complications (as when a garbage
pit is dug, or when ancients transferred "rubble" from one room to another
space).
Typology
refers to the study and classification of certain artefacts that can
be grouped together because they share important characteristics. Examples
would be ceramic or pottery, glass, textiles, and tools. Within a given
category, analysis can determine the geographic origin and rough date
of a given piece.
Explicitly
dated materials include coins most commonly, but can also include
what are called "documentary texts," which are deeds of sale, rental
contracts, I.O.U.'s, marriage contracts, or deeds of gift like the ostracon
(inscribed piece of pottery) to the right. Ancient coins were stamped,
as ours are, with dates, although not with absolute dates, since there
was no universally agreed-upon calendar. Rather, the date would be "year
'x'" of a particular ruler's reign. Documentary texts, for their part,
begin with a date clause which also indicates "year 'x'" of someone's
rule. The date clause in the deed to the left is "In the first year
of...," probably in the first year of the liberation of Israel, that
is, the first year of its revolt (66 C.E.). When these
kinds of documents are found in a particular stratum, that stratum can
be dated with some confidence.
Together,
this evidence can yield the history of a site's occupation, though since
evidence can be read several ways, archaeologists are under a special
obligation to publish a final report detailing their excavations. That
was never done for the Qumran site, so the following evidence will be
derived from De Vaux's preliminary reports, VanderKam pp. 22-3,
and the Magness
article you read.1
Evidence
& Questions
This part
of the project will focus on the coin evidence, since it was central
to De Vaux's determination of the chronology of the settlement and because
the dates are pretty straightforward.
De Vaux
found coins ranging in date over a 355-year period, as illustrated in
the Table below. He had other evidence to help interpret the coins,
such as the stratigraphy of their location. But you have much of his
evidence in the chart below. Your job will be to review the Table and
reconstruct the history of the settlement based on the evidence.
Coin or
numismatic evidence is a little tricky. By virtue of its dates, it gives
us the terminus post quem, or earliest date that the coin could
have appeared at the site; a coin minted in 100 B.C.E.
could not appear at the site before that date. But the coin could
have appeared at the site as long as it was in circulation, and we usually
don't know how long a period that was for most coins.
Year |
Government |
Ruler/Year |
Evidence
from Qumran |
223-187 B.C.E. |
Seleucid (=Greek) |
Antiochus III |
1-2 bronze |
175-164 B.C.E. |
Seleucid (=Greek) |
Antiochus IV |
1-2 bronze |
145-139 B.C.E. |
Seleucid (=Greek) |
Demetrius II |
1 silver |
139/138-129 B.C.E. |
Seleucid (=Greek) |
Antiochus VII |
3-5 silver
1-2 bronze |
134-104 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
John Hyrcanus |
1 coin |
126-9/8 B.C.E. |
Tyrian |
/// |
561 silver tetradrachmas |
104-103 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
Aristobulus |
1 coin |
103-76 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
Alexander Jannaeus |
143 coins |
76-67 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
Alexandra Salome
and Hyrcanus II |
1 coin |
63-40 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
Hyrcanus II |
5 coins |
40-37 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
Antigonus Archelaus |
4 coins |
37-4 B.C.E. |
Jewish |
Herod the Great |
10 coins |
4 B.C.E.-6 C.E. |
Jewish |
Herod Archelaus |
16 coins |
41-44 C.E. |
Roman |
Agrippa I |
78 coins |
41-68 C.E. |
Roman |
Procuratorial Period |
91 coins (46 from Nero's reign, 54-68C.E.; 13 of
these found above level of ash otherwise dated to 68 C.E.) |
66-68 C.E. |
Jewish |
First Jewish Revolt |
0 from Year 1 (66 C.E.)
83 from Year 2
5 from Year 3
0 from Year 4 (69 C.E.) |
132-135 C.E. |
Jewish |
Second Jewish Revolt |
2-3 coins |
Question
#1. Based on the above evidence, determine the period of occupation
of the Qumran site. Account for variations in the numbers of coins found
in particular periods. Can you make any educated guesses about the period
from 68 B.C.E.-135 C.E. (note denominations
of coins and gaps in coin evidence, which suggest periods when the site
was not occupied and therefore a subsequent change in occupants).
1
"Fouille au Khirbet Qumrân," Revue Biblique
(hereafter RB) 60 (1953) 83-106; "Fouilles au Khirbet Qumrân,"
RB 61 (1954) 206-36; and "Fouilles de Khirbet Qumrân,"
RB 63 (1956) 533-77.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|