Introduction

Climate change poses a serious and imminent threat to forest health across Washington State putting the Evergreen State at high risk for significant forest damage. Expansive forests that cover over half of the state not only contribute to its nickname but also play a significant role in the state economy. Forest products are the third largest manufacturing sector in Washington and forestry supports local communities statewide by supplying over 101,000 jobs and $28 billion in 20171

The impacts of climate change on Washington state forestry pose a great threat to the ecology of the state and as an extension, many plant, animal, and human communities. The eastern half of Washington is known historically to be of much higher drought risk and suffer from more wildfires and insect damage than the western half (although climate change impacts and rising temperatures across the state are projected to increase risk in the Western half of the state in years to come). Eastern Washington is also home to four large Indian reservations. To further explore the impacts of climate change on tribal communities I chose to examine the forest health of the Colville Indian Reservation in eastern Washington.

As climate changes causes drought conditions to worsen, fire regimes to shift, and insect infiltration to intensify, community resilience is of utmost importance. Tribal communities in Washington suffer from greater climate vulnerability than urban communities due to their close connection to and reliance on natural resources. Forest disturbances in particular threaten tribal traditional foods, plants, and wildlife of significant economic, medicinal, cultural, and community health importance 2. For example, deer and elk are two culturally important species whose habitats have been impacted by decreasing forest health. Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) is also at risk as climate change creates new challenges for tribes to adapt to 3. When TEK is used in conjunction with Western science a robust, multi-scale strategy for climate change adaptation results 4

The Colville Reservation

The Colville reservation is made up a confederation of twelve tribes of 9,520 members across 1.4 million acres making it the second most populated reservation and the largest reservation in the state. The Colville reservation is not unique only for its size, but for its expansive forest. Over 65% of the reservation, 922,240 acres, are forested.

Colville Reservation. Photo Credit: Mark Pouley via FLICKR

Colville Reservation. Photo Credit: Mark Pouley via FLICKR

Forestry and wood products have been the traditional source of revenue for the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation and the backbone of the CCT economy. Increased climate induced disturbances such as wildfires and beetle outbreaks threaten tribal livelihoods as forests serve as the lifeblood of economic activity. In addition to economic impacts, climate change also threatens the health and safety of tribal communities on the Colville Reservation particularly through wildfire damage and increased air pollution. 5

Colville Reservation in Eastern Washington

Climatically Propagated Forest Disturbances: Fires and Damaging Insects

Climate change induced droughts and warmer temperatures have increased the size, frequency, and intensity of forest fires across the state 6 The area of water-limited forests in Washington are expected to increase by 32% in the 2020s and 12% in the 2040s and 2080s, relative to 20th century water-limited forests 7. Climate is also expected to be a significant stressor to pine forests in the Columbia River Basin and eastern Cascades by the 2060s particularly in northeastern Washington where the Colville Reservation is located 8. By the 2080s forest area burned is projected to triple from 2010 burn area. Overall, increased forest fire activity has lead to widespread forest mortality, carbon emissions, poor air quality, and substantial and expensive fire suppression expenditures 9.

Large Fires on the Colville Reservation: 2001-2018

Higher average temperatures and increased drought also creates the conditions for the otherwise manageable bark beetle, to be deadly. Bark beetles thrive in dry, stressed, and unhealthy trees and are disastrously successful at pushing weak trees suffering from drought past their limits 10. Daily temperature regimes allow for the synchronization of beetle populations which facilitate mass simultaneous emergence of beetles, increasing their ability to overcome host tree defenses. In addition, their one-year life cycle allows for faster population growth than multi-year cycles. Warmer temperatures lead to higher rates of survival and faster development increasing the beetles damaging effect. 11 Projected warming of 7 degrees F by the end of the century will make it easier for beetles to survive year-round, intensifying their projected damage and expand their populations further north, increasing the range of their damage 12. In addition, host tree defence mechanisms are often compromised in high temperature and drought conditions. Drought stress prevents the lodgepole pine from producing sufficient toxin resin to pitch away attacking beetles, making them more susceptible to damage 13.

Western Pine Bark Beetle. Image from USDA Forest Service.

Western Pine Bark Beetle. Image from USDA Forest Service.

Recently, forests across the Western United States have been faced with enormous pine bark beetle outbreaks. Mountain pine beetles have incurred the most widespread damage as they host in a variety of pines including the lodgepole, ponderosa, white bark, and western white pines. Western pine beetles are another significant damaging agent. Each year, the Washington State Department of Natural Resources conducts an aerial survey to assess forest damage. In 2017, the survey was conducted over 22 million acres of land. According to this survey, damage in either tree mortality, defoliation, or foliar disease was found in 512,000 acres, an over 100,000 acre increase from 2016. Mortality due to bark beetles covered approximately 321,000 acres 14. Mountain pine beetles are the most prevalent damaging agent in eastern Washington and on the Colville Reservation. These beetle host in lodgepole, ponderosa, whitebark, and western white pines. Western pine beetles are the second most prominent bark beetle in the state and within Colville and host primarily in ponderosa pines 15.

Fig 1. Total western pine and mountain pine beetle damage across Washington state in 2017.

Fig 1. Total western pine and mountain pine beetle damage across Washington state in 2017.

Western and Mountain Pine Beetle damage 2013-2017

Western and Mountain Pine Beetle Prevalence in 2017

Promoting Climate Resiliency

In order to promote climate resiliency to climate induced forest disturbances, it is of utmost importance to strengthen tribal-federal relationships and develop diverse partnerships.One such partnership exists in the North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperation (NPLCC) which collects tribal input for adaptation on how to both identify and prioritize climate change adaptations. Interagency-tribal partnerships can be particularly useful for developing forest management strategies. In addition, involvement in and support of climate change initiatives will spread awareness and provide a platform for Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK). Using a combination of TEK and Western science, tribal governments and federal governments as well as other groups can work together to develop realistic, meaningful, and sustainable forest management and restoration practices. 16

The Colville Tribe has already taken steps towards increasing climate resiliency. The tribe has formed a Climate Change Steering Committee and a Climate Change Planning Group who provide a link between the Steering Committee and the public and disseminate information. Their website can be found here

References

  1. Hatfield , Brian. “Washington State Forest Products Sector.” Washington State Department of Commerce, 2017, Online at www.commerce.wa.gov/growing-the-economy/key-sectors/forest-products/.

  2. Dalton, M.M., Mote, P.W., Snover A.K. Climate Change in the Northwest: Implications for Our Landscapes, Waters, and Communities. 2013. Cascadia Consulting. 8.3.4, pg 217. Online at http://www.cascadiaconsulting.com/uploads/pdf/climate_change_in_the_northwest_oct2013z.pdf

  3. Voggesser, G., K. Lynn, J. Daigle, F. K. Lake, and D. Ranco. 2013. “Cultural Impacts to Tribes from Climate Change Influences on Forests.” Climatic Change. Online at https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2014_voggesser.pdf

  4. Tribal Science Council. Integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in Environmental Science, Policy and Decision-Making. 2011. EPA. Online at https://archive.epa.gov/region9/tribal/web/pdf/tribal-ecological-knowledge-env-sci-policy-dm.pdf.

  5. Prepared Statement of Jack Ferguson Member, Colville Business Council Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation Board Member, Intertribal Timber Council Oversight. 2016. Hearing on “Tribal Prosperity and Self-Determination through Energy Development” https://docs.house.gov/meetings/II/II00/20161004/105406/HHRG-114-II00-Wstate-FergusonJ-20161004.pdf

  6. Confronting Climate Change in Washington. Union of Concerned Scientists, 2018. Online at https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/08/ucs-confronting-climate-change-washington-2018.pdf

  7. Littell, J.S., E.E. Oneil, D. McKenzie, J.A. Hicke, J.A. Lutz, R.A. Norheim, and M.M. Elsner. 2010. Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington state, USA. Climatic Change 102(1-2):129-158. Online at http://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9858-x

  8. Littell, J.S., E.E. Oneil, D. McKenzie, J.A. Hicke, J.A. Lutz, R.A. Norheim, and M.M. Elsner. 2010. Forest ecosystems, disturbance, and climatic change in Washington state, USA. Climatic Change 102(1-2):129-158. Online at http://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9858-x

  9. Abatzoglou, J.T., and A.P. Williams. 2016. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(42):11770-11775. Online at http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607171113

  10. (Bark Beetles Attacking Drought-Stressed Douglas Fir Trees Across Washington. 2018. Department of Natural Resources. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/news/bark-beetles-attacking-drought-stressed-douglas-fir-trees-across-washington

  11. Bentz, B, Klepzig, K, Bark Beetles and Climate Change in the United States. Climate Change Resource Center, U.S. Forest Service. https://www.fs.usda.gov/ccrc/index.php?q=topics/bark-beetles-and-climate-change-united-states.

  12. Preisler, H.K., J.A. Hicke, A.A. Ager, and J.L. Hayes. 2012. Climate and weather influences on spatial temporal patterns of mountain pine beetle populations in Washington and Oregon. Ecology 93(11):2421- 2434. Online at http://doi.org/10.1890/11-1412.1

  13. Preisler, Haiganoush K., Jeffrey A. Hicke, Alan A. Ager, and Jane L. Hayes. “Climate and weather influences on spatial temporal patterns of mountain pine beetle populations in Washington and Oregon.” Ecology 93, no. 11 (2012): 2421-2434. https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1890/11-1412.1

  14. Forest Health Highlight in Washington - 2017. 2018. Washington State Department of Natural Resources. https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/rp_fh_2017_forest_health_highlights.pdf

  15. Colville National Forest Bark Beetle Assessment for the Restoration Approach. 2014. USDA Forest Service. https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprd3820388.pdf

  16. Voggesser, G., K. Lynn, J. Daigle, F. K. Lake, and D. Ranco. 2013. “Cultural Impacts to Tribes from Climate Change Influences on Forests.” Climatic Change. Online at https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw_2014_voggesser.pdf