Keith Douglass Warner OFM's
My primary research activities since 2004 have addressed ethics and values in classical biological control practice and policy, the broader social institutional context of invasive species control efforts. The practice of introducing novel organisms to control invasive pests has the greatest possibility of providing sustainable pest control, but has been clouded by ethical concerns, which has made policymaking difficult. This research has been funded by the National Science Foundation and the California Department of Food and Agriculture, and has taken me to New Zealand, South Africa, Australia, Vietnam, France and Switzerland.
Biological control is the action of parasites, predators, and pathogens in maintaining another organism’s density at a lower average than would occur in their absence. Thus, biological control is a natural phenomenon, a field of study, and a deliberate pest control strategy. It is a keystone to ecologically rational and integrated pest management (IPM) in agriculture.My research in this field investigates the social, economic, ethical, and policy factors shaping, driving and constraining this sceintific research field and its institutions.
I contributed to Economics and adoption of conservation biological control with some chaps from Lincoln University in New Zealand, also published in Biological Control. In February of 2009 I presented a paper at the 3rd International Symposium on the Biological Control of Arthropods in Christchurch New Zealand: Evaluating Scientific Institutional Capacity For Biological Control: A California Study As A Model Regional Network Assessment (with the help of co-authors). This was published in the February 2009 proceedings.
The journal Biocontrol, Science & Technology published an article I co-authored titled "An analysis of historical trends in classical biological control of arthropods suggests need for a new centralized database in the USA." The charts in this pre-publication draft are in color, and easier to read than the actual B&W pdf.
In March of 2007 I received a National Science Foundation grant for my study "Managing Risk in the Public Interest: How Ethics and Values Shape Biological Control Practice and Policy" from the Program Ethics & Values in Science, Engineering & Technology. I am conducting a omparative analysis of the ethics and policy debates clouding biological control introductions in the US, New Zealand, and South Africa. I am writing up my findings, which are extensive. Here is an article I wrote for Public Understanding of Science Manipulating risk communication: value predispositions shape public understandings of invasive species science in Hawaii
Visiting Working for Water in South Africa
I wrote about the importance of public understanding and support for biological control as a public interest science, which was published in the proceedings of the XIIth International Symposium for the Biological Control of Weeds in Montpellier, France, 2007: What Every Biocontrol Researcher Should Know About the Public. I attended the Biocontrol For Nature symposium in October 2010, and contributed Fighting pathophobia: how to construct constructive public engagement with biocontrol for nature without augmenting public fears which is forthcoming in Biocontrol. I wrote a book chapter titled Understanding Public Risk Perception for the Use of Beneficial Microorganisms which appeared in Beneficial Microorganisms in Agriculture, Food and the Environment, edited by I. Sundh, A. Wilcks and M.S. Goettel (CAB International, 2012).
Here is an article published in the January 2010 edition of Bioscience, coauthored with Nick Jordan, titled: Enhancing the Multifunctionality of US Agriculture. I was particularly pleased that Stephen Gliessman, an old UCSC teacher of mine, recommended our approach in his editorial "Landscape Multifunctionality and Agriculture" in the Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 34(5) 465.
I contributed to a policy forum article addressing the problems of the biofuel gold rush recommending instead the "Sustainable Development of the Agricultural Bio-Economy," published in the journal Science June 15, 2007. I co-presented with him at the AAAS in February 2006, which was a lot of fun.
Agroecology as Participatory Science: Emerging Alternatives to Technology Transfer Extension Practice in Science, Technology & Human Values in December 2008.
With Jenny Broome I coauthored an article in the special sustainable winegrape issue of California Agriculture: Agro-environmental partnerships facilitate sustainable wine-grape production and assessment
The quality of sustainability: Agroecological partnerships and the geographic branding of California winegrapes. Journal of Rural Studies. 23, 142–155. 2007
Extending agroecology: Grower participation in partnerships is key to social learning. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21(2); 84–94. 2006
Integrated Farming Systems and Pollution Prevention Initiatives Stimulate Co-Learning Extension Strategies. Journal of Extension 44 (5) October 2006
Agroecology in Action: How USEPA Links Policy with Practice by Supporting the Extension of Integrated Farming Systems. Proceedings from the Conference on the Future of Agriculture, Sacramento, California. 87-100. August 2006.
For information regarding this website please contact Keith Douglass Warner OFM